patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Township Manager's Two-Year Contract Approved

Commissioners on Wednesday approved a new contract for Doug Cleland, who had been working without a contract since December 2011.

 

Lower Merion commissioners, after more than six hours of debate Wednesday night, voted 8-5 to approve a two-year contract for Township Manager Doug Cleland.

"I look upon this discussion as, how do we address excellence in Lower Merion?" Commissioner Rick Churchill told the board and residents gathered in the nearly full board room at the beginning of the human relations committee meeting. "Are we going to reward it, are we going to penalize it—what are we going to do?"

Commissioner Dan Bernheim, who along with Churchill and Commissioner Scott Zelov formed an ad hoc committee to draw up Cleland's new contract, summed up the contract—to expire Jan. 6, 2014, when the new board will reorganize—and the process used to shape it.

Cleland's base salary in 2012 will remain at $202,989; his base salary will increase 2 percent in 2013 to $207,049. With added longevity and deferred compensation benefits, Cleland's pay package will cost about $275,000 per year.

Many of the about 20 township residents who spoke during the public comment period expressed concern over the cost of the contract in the current economic climate, some noting that Cleland makes more money than the mayor of Philadelphia, the governor of Pennsylvania and every township manager from surrounding municipalities.

Several others, including former board Vice President Mark Taylor, who read a statement on behalf of a bipartisan group of 11 former commissioners, spoke in favor of approving a new contract for Cleland.

Commissioner Jenny Brown expressed concerns about the language used in multiple sections of the proposed contract and about the necessity of several added benefits—such as a township car and fuel, deferred compensation and longevity—and lamented that the board had not sought independent legal counsel in the matter.

Bernheim, who noted he wished he had received those comments in advance so he could provide more adequate responses, addressed Brown's concerns.

Commissioner Steve Lindner said he believed the whole process of providing Cleland with a new contract had taken too long and emphasized the importance of keeping Cleland with the township so he could pass on all of his expertise to a successor. Aside from the numbers, there are other costs, Lindner said.

"There's a cost to replace, a cost of morale—none of that shows up in a contract," Lindner said. "I vote to keep the continuity of the township."

Brown made several motions to amend the contract, none of which passed. If any had passed, it would have caused the contract to be tabled once again.

"To an objective observer, most commissioners on this board are blinded by their affection for Doug Cleland," Brown said. "If we were not looking at Doug Cleland, we would not be looking at a compensation package that cost $275,000."

Republican commissioners Brown, Zelov and Lew Gould voted against the contract, along with Democratic commissioners Brian Gordon and Cheryl Gelber in an 8-5 vote; Commissioner Phil Rosenzweig had asked to be excused from the meeting.

Related Topics: Contract, Doug Cleland, lower merion board of commissioners, and township manager

Bob Guzzardi

8:02 am on Thursday, July 12, 2012

It is evident that the "FOR" Commissioners have no real world business experience. Highly productive employees need to be highly compensated. Given the deteriorating condition of Lower Merion's fisc, it is difficult to see how this level of compensation is justified. Over past ten years , the quality and quantity dof services have not increased, and, in some cases like roads, deteriorated while Debt Spending and Taxes have increased far above the rate of inflation and population growth. This is less productivity. "Doing more with less" is not a Lower Merion government value. Lower productivity; higher pay? How does this make sense? Cheryl Gelber demonstrates her usual common sense.

Reply

AMP

11:49 am on Thursday, July 12, 2012

If you heard last night they said they haven't replaced positions when they are vacated, so if you keep cutting positions how do you expect to get the same service when you stretch the current employees especially the middle management. They are the ones who carry the burden of the township on their shoulders you freeze their salaries and try to cut their benefits because they are easy prey they do not have a union to protect them but upper management and the union workers still get thier rewards. I agree with Cheryl you should have a reward system for employees who go above and beyond who do thier job with what they are given they should be compensated for a job well done.

Reply

Jack Kerr

12:51 pm on Thursday, July 12, 2012

If Doug were to leave, what salary would be offered to recruit a new Township Manager? Like Doug, would the Assitant Township Manager or CFO expect the same salary and benefits?

Reply

Bob Guzzardi

7:56 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

The township has fewer employees now and services are at same level which appear to be satisfactory. The concept of "doing more with less" is the concept of productivity. Because of technology, doing more with less is feasible. and if Doug and others were not so highly compensated either taxpayers would be paying more or getting more with additional services. Actually spending almost $6 million on new studies for Carl Dranoff's Ardmore Transit is not money not well spent. The $24 million expansion of Lower Merion's bricks and mortar libraries in the digital age is money not wisely spent. Those two items demonstrate the incompetent management. Not to mention about $1,2 million to put lights under Anderson Ave bridge or $900 K to straighten the intersection at Ardmore and Lancaster. or $135 for Gateway Fountain. The uselessness of these expenditures demonstrates the incompetence of both the Board of Commissioners and Management, that is, Doug Cleland.

Reply

Douglas Martindale

8:34 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

The market dictates what the manager's position is worth, nothing else. The bottom line is that most of the country in the last 5 years has suffered job losses and significant pay cuts, why should township employees be any different. I frankly believe they could have offered a 20 to 30% pay reduction easily. I think it would be almost certain he wouldn't leave. Where would he go? Who's hiring, especially municipalities?? It's simply the problem when the people making the decisions are playing with other peoples money. Have any of the commissioners ever had to make payroll on their own dime? I have my doubts. Don't overestimate Mr. Clelands abilities or worth. A number of years ago I complained to a boss about my job. Instead of pandering to my whining, she told me "Doug, you're replacable". I'll never forget that day and I shaped up immediately. And so to is Mr. Cleland.

Reply

Rick Liberatoscioli

7:42 am on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

At the LM Township Board of Commissioners Meeting to investigate the widespread Felony Criminal Corruption of its township public officials … will make the Penn State criminal corruption look like child’s play by comparison.

Reply

Rick Liberatoscioli

12:29 pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

I would like to present to the LM Township Commissioners at this Wednesdays commissioners meeting of the standing felony criminal charges against the Townships public official relating to Mr. Cleland's employment contract,

Section 3. Termination and Severance Pay:

In the event that the Township terminates Cleland for cause, this Agreement and the rights and obligations of the parties hereunder, cease. “Cause” is defined and hereby limited for the purposes of this Agreement to the following: (1) willful misconduct and/or neglect of duty, (2) felony or misdemeanor conviction of any crime involving moral turpitude, (3) dishonesty in the conduct of the Township’s affairs, or (4) any other act of similar or greater seriousness.

The Lower Merion Police have made direct threats to falsely imprison and threat of bodily harm should I do so.

I hope the Township Commissioners will contact me to arrange for a safe presentation before the commissioners of the felony criminal allegations against the public officials involved.

Reply

Rick Liberatoscioli

6:01 am on Thursday, July 19, 2012

Excellent story on "co-operation, being co-opted,... then the final slide into full corruption".
http://mainlinemedianews.com/articles/2012/07/18/main_line_suburban_life/opinion/doc50003aa56f5f7325499337.txt?viewmode=default

Here a "AAA" rated teaching institution, in one day, is totally decimated by is long standing "cover-up" of its criminal corruption within. Damages are expected to total by the many millions of dollars and prison time for those involved .... simply because of corrupt officials chose to "cover-up" what they knew was in fact "criminal acts" under their watch. They themselves knowingly became an accomplice and or accessory to the criminal acts.

The Lower Merion Township Commissioners will face the same fate as did Penn State through their own un-investigated and subsequent "cover-up" of criminal acts under their watch as well. Here an entire Lower Merion community stands to be decimated.

The extensive criminal charges have been presented to the Lower Merion Township Commissioners.

Richard Liberatoscioli
richard.liberatoscioli@gmail.com

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Ardmore-Merion-Wynnewood Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks