patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Privatize Pa. Lottery? Voters Say No

Could privatizing the lottery mean fewer people will play?

 

Pennsylvanians do not want their lottery to be privatized, as Gov. Tom Corbett is proposing, according to a new Franklin & Marshall College Poll.

The poll found that 47 percent of those polled strongly opposed the privatization with 17 somewhat opposing it. Only 7 percent were strongly in favor with 11 percent being somewhat in favor of the move.

Most people polled, 75 percent, said they would play the lottery about the same amount as they do now if it were privatized, but a not insignificant number of people, 19 said they would play less frequently.

The Franklin & Marshall College Poll interviewed 622 Pennsylvania voters between January 29 and February 3. The margin of error is reported as plus or minus 3.9 percentage points.

A recent editorial in the Philadelphia Inquirer pointed out that although lotteries as natural candidates for privatization that it is hard to make the decision with so little input from the public.

What do you think? Should the Pennsylvania Lottery be privatized? Share your opinions in the comments area below.

The American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, or AFSCME, filed a lawsuit to stop the privatization. Some state lawmakers, lottery employees and others joined in the lawsuit. Other lawmakers, including state Rep. Mark Painter (D-Montgomery) have signed a friend of the court, or amicus brief, according to a release from Painter’s office.

"It was really a shock for me as a newly elected legislator," said Painter in the news release. "The governor took it upon himself to sign away control of the lottery without even consulting with those who represent the people who will be most affected."

The lawsuit claims that the governor does not have the authority to privatize the lottery without approval from the legislature.

Related Topics: Franklin & Marshall Poll, Pa Lottery, Pennsylvania Lottery, Privatize Lottery, Privatize PA Lottery, and gov. tom corbett

andrew

8:09 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

The decision should be left to the legislature. A law should be passed blocking any executive action. There is no clear benefit for the people of Pennsylvania. Sell the state stores, not the lottery.

Reply

Jeanne

9:17 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

I am so sick of Tom Corbett!!! He looks so much that I remember of my Grandfather but my grandfather would be appalled if in any way there was only a slight mention of him being compared to Tom Corbett. As you can see I don't refer to him as Governor because in my opinion he is not my Governor! He wants to privatize the lottery, the State Stores and wants to shut down the prison in Cressona and put the union employees there and in the other privatizations out of work!! I think it is now time to "Privatize Tom Corbett" and let him move on and get the heck out of our state! Hopefully he will a one-term Governor!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kim

9:38 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Jeanne, you sound like you have real issues! Who cares if Corbett looks like dear old grandpa? With your line of thinking, I guess I shouldn't respect the office of the president, I can just call Obama arrogant a**hole! I say hooray for Governor Corbett!

Comment_arrow

JEFFREY

9:22 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Forget who he reminds you of. It's has nothing to do with this. What does have to do with this is that Governor Corbett has his own agenda and it does not align with the majority of Pennsylvanians. He seems to be doing whatever he can to get even with the Democrats and senior citizens. He is trying to get rid of anything that represents aid to senior citizens, from the benefits of the PA Lottery to Social Security cutbacks. He is such an ass hole. Got to be a ONE term governor.

Drew

9:42 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

I think any decision to privatize the Lottery or State Stores should be put on the ballot as a referendum and let the people of the Commonwealth make the decision, not the politicians who bow not to the will of the people, but rather to the power of the almighty dollars they received from special interest groups...

Reply
Comment_arrow

JEFFREY

9:31 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Drew, I think you're on to something here. Good idea.

michael

10:25 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Kim, you make no sense and calling the President a name like that just shows you your not very nice , you make it a political thing, Corbett needs to keep the lottery and state stores alone, as drew says let the voter's make the desicion on this, i think jeanne was trying to say that her grandfather would be embarrassed to be compared to Corbett , Corbett is not the man he was when he ran for office, let's not forget his involvement in the Penn State scandal.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kim

12:42 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

It is so easy to set libs off. You are right. I shouldn't do it for sport!

Comment_arrow

JEFFREY

9:37 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Also, he was involved as Attorney General when Sandusky's lifestyle first came to light and did not investigate the charges enough, maybe trying to let the charges go due to Sandusky's involvement with Penn State. Remember, Corbett was and still is on the Board at Penn State. He should be on trial as well as the other executives of Penn State. He is one shady character.

Carl Wester

11:12 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

The state selling off assets in the name of 'privatization' is a subject that needs more discussion, something that Corbett, as a republican, will be opposed to. After all, opposing a republican should be a capital crime, because they, like lawyers, know it all!
In the mean time, I am opposed to the sale of the lottery for various reasons:
1. I do not want to pay all the lawyer's fees that will be involved in structuring a contract that will not benefit the public, nor the current employees of the lottery system.
2. The myth that 'private industry' does it better depends on your point of view. First, it reduces or eliminates benefits such as health car and retirement provisions for employees; the money saved goes straight into the pockets of the executives. Then there still is a profit to be made for the investors (in some firms the same as the executives). The money left after that will go to the intended beneficiaries, in this case elderly Pennsylvanians, in other cases it will be the care of patients in a private hospital.
3. The state loses control over a stream of revenue and may have to raise taxes to make up for that.
A state should not sell income-producing assets for a one-time gain. That is short-sighted and destructive to the fabric of society.

Reply
Comment_arrow

NS

11:30 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Agreed, the selling of income streams for ready cash is a sign of the apocalypse of the state's financial condition. However, it might be prudent to outsource the administration of the program given the inability of the government to run anything efficiently.

Comment_arrow

JEFFREY

9:49 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Remember, the Pennsylvania Lottery is among the most successful lotteries in the country. Corbett wants to get rid of this program operated by the state mainly because the lottery benefits mostly senior citizens and the majority are democrats and he will do anything he can to piss off his adversaries. He could care less about his constituents. Down with Corbett.

Chin

11:41 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Why should the commonwealth be in the liquor or lottery business? The LCB started out as a board to issue liquor licenses and somewhere along the way someone got greedy and decided total control was the way to go. Prohibition ended 80 years ago.

The lottery is gambling and should be run privately but regulated just as the casinos are.

License them. Tax them. Use the money to fix roads, equip classrooms.

You want less government bureaucracy, waste and spending? Then trim the fat. Less government spending on salaries, benefits and pensions, more money for the benefit of all Pennsylvanians.

Reply
Comment_arrow

NS

11:56 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013

The state can derive more financial benefits by just licensing the lottery, not selling it. Then the amount of profit extracted by the administrator can be set by the lawmakers and they can have a bidding process for the licence, like they do for everything else. In this manner the state maintains control and full economic benefit.

Comment_arrow

JEFFREY

10:14 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

I believe that this governor is trying to get even with democrates whether it's in the best interest of the people or not. For one thing, the Pennsylvania lottery is one of the most successful lotteries in the country. You don't privatize something that is bringing in so much money. He hates any program that affords any assistance to senior citizens, including the lottery and social security. He has no place in our government, mostly due to he is not making decisions in the best interest in Pennsylvanians.

mary smith

12:20 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Absolutly NOT! Just taking away something else from Seniors. Corbett needs to worry about his own backyard!

Reply
Comment_arrow

JEFFREY

10:18 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

He needs to worry about much more than his back yard. He is on the hotseat for sencond term for all the shenanigans he has tried to pull. He is one of Pennsylvanias worst governor in history. I have voted for many republicans in my day, but Corbett is downright dangerous to Pennsylvanians. Get rid of him after this term or else he'll try to destroy more of what Pennsylvania is famous for - helping it's citizens.

anthony jones

12:45 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

NO WAY! I was a Lottery agent for 30 years and in thoes 30 years only got paid 5% of my sales I had to give it up I could not pay anyone enough to run the machine. Woul anyone else out there work for someone for 30 years and never get a raise????? Would our government work for 30 years without a raise??? If it is sold to private investors who is to say anyone will get paid even the winners!

Reply
Comment_arrow

bigben

1:52 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

that's the point of privatizing. If they want to make a profit, they have to hire people to sell the tickets, pay outlets to house their machines, AND payout jackpots. The only thing that they can do to really screw with the middlemen IS to sell lottery tickets online. But that would probably eliminate a lot of people who don't have ready access to internet

anthony jones

12:49 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

To thoes of you who recommend licensing! Agents DO pay the State Licensing fees!

Reply
Comment_arrow

JEFFREY

10:22 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Yes, but not the profits. They will no longer go to the people it was intended for.

Kim

12:59 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Most of you people are union loving, Corbett hating people who let your ideology blind you to the facts! Did you also think the president should have had a vote before jamming through healthcare....no way...it never would have passed! We are still waiting to learn what's REALLY in it. You act like the politics aren't played on BOTH sides. Chin, they don't want to cut spending and have less government. They really don't care about waste either! They are most likely union people who don't want their good deal taken away.

Reply
Comment_arrow

john

1:23 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

The patient protection and affordable care act ( Obama care) was passed by the federal legislature, the system set up by something you might have heard about at some time when you were out of your cave-it's called the constitution- you know- the one you think only applies to what you want!

Comment_arrow

john

1:23 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

The patient protection and affordable care act ( Obama care) was passed by the federal legislature, the system set up by something you might have heard about at some time when you were out of your cave-it's called the constitution- you know- the one you think only applies to what you want!

Comment_arrow

JEFFREY

10:30 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Kim, my dear Kim, I hope you wake up soon. You are having a nightmare. O'bama did have it passed by the legislators. I take it you may have been out of the country all that time that congress battled over it. You don't know what's in it because you don't want to. I'm not here to bash your thoughts or how you feel about the politics going on, but to show you what you just said was highly "inaccurate" and without merit. I'm glad to hear you don't want waste either, because the Pennsylvania Lottery is one of the most successful lotteries in the country. Now we don't really want to get rid of that, do we? I didn't think so. Take care.

Kim

1:31 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

John, Drew mentioned that the issue should be put on the ballot. I made the comparison to Obamacare, which went against the will of "the people". Try to follow along, before you put your foot in your mouth ...whoops...too late!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Star Thrower

2:12 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

What John is forgetting is the complete mockery BO has made of the constitution - Not one single member of congress wrote a single line, or even read the 2000-plus page document .. doesn't anyone remember Pelosi saying we have to pass it before we know what's in it?

john

2:38 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

We did have a ballot Kim, it was called the election. You lost! You lost seats in the house! You lost seats in the senate! You lost by a wide margin. "The people" did speak, just not enough people who agree with you. In case you didn't read that part of the constitution, we don't have a national ballot on specific issues, just on those we elect to to make them-representative democracy. Don't like that, the change who you elect. Oh, wait, you just tried that and it didn't workout o well for you did it? Hurts, doesn't it?

Reply

Kim

2:53 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

John, you re obviously too THICK to get the point I was making. The more you try to make me look like a fool, the more foolish YOU look. Let it go! In regard to the election, WE ALL LOST! You are just too ignorant to realize it! Hate to tell you, but I am a 1%er...and I earned it through hard work and perseverance. I was, personally,going to be just fine no matter how the election turned out. Don't worry about me! I worry about the people who were too foolish to realize they were swindled. I have to give Obama and his team credit...they are the best. He had you all believing that NO ONE could have done better! What losers you are to believe that malarkey ( Uncle Joe's word...ha ha)! I have a beautiful home, nice car, no debt, access to the best healthcare....I know this is hard to believe in today's world, but I was really worried for the people who are getting screwed by Obama...just too ignorant to realize it!

Reply

Gamecock fan

3:51 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Kim: You truly sound like an arrogant, narcissitic, unsympathetic human being. Whatever your beliefs why do you think you have the right to belittle people instead of just sharing ideas, i.e. point/counterpoint. Certainly these items (lottery privatization and liquour store issue) should be placed on the ballot and not be determined by a politician who has a 20% approval rating in his own state. It is people like you who give the 1% ers a bad name. When you have seen your final days let me know what your $$$$$ does for you on your judgement day.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JEFFREY

10:58 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

You're too kind and generous. You gave him a 20% rating. I give him a 10% rating at best.

Nazaretti

4:04 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

People...please be more understanding...she has an obsession with Barry...intrusive thoughts, dreams, the whole nine yards...we think she will grow out of it, probably around 2016.

Reply

Sine Quanon

4:27 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

the lottery is for suckers. the people who play can least afford it . if you look at the odds, it's a fools game. same for casino's. i welcome any move that gets the state out of the vice business...they control liquor and gamling and what's next....prositituion? the asians in chinatown phila. didn't want a casino anywhere near them because it breaks up families and causes financial chaos. i see people on food stamps buying stacks of number and lottery tickets...government wants to keep them poor. i have witnessed state stores sell booze to drunks. i don't want my tax dollars a part of that crap. sell the systems and let them pay taxes so taxpayers don't have to pay for pensions, benefits and salaries for people who are aldready overpaid in these jobs.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nazaretti

6:35 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Good points, SQN. The lottery is a tax on stupidity, and stupid people have enough problems already.

Comment_arrow

Chin

6:56 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Good post, Sine.

I'll play the lottery once in a while just for fun and usually only games with the best odds. Who doesn't like games of chance? They have been popular at carnivals for ages.

Comment_arrow

JEFFREY

11:03 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Nazaretti, I'm glad you determined what's good for everyone else. You're intitled to your opinion of course, no matter how assinine it is.

Kim

5:16 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Man up men! You boys can't handle a little lady like me. You attack and when I have the nerve to bite back you cry to each other....wah wah! :( I'm moving on! You can all relax now....scary lady going away! Ha ha ha

Reply

JEFFREY

9:18 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

I believe that this governor is trying to get even with democrates whether it's in the best interest of the people. For one thing, the Pennsylvania lottery is one of the most successful lotteries in the country. You don't privatize something that is bringing in so much money. He hates any program that affords any assistance to senior citizens, including the lottery and social security. He has no place in our government, mostly due to he is not making decisions in the best interest in Pennsylvanians.

Reply

Earnest

9:23 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

The company Corbett is looking at selling the PA Lottery to is a British company that runs out of Canada. Not only is he looking at selling it to a foreign company, but the company is in the business of funding the Canadian Teachers Pensions. Both current teachers and retired teachers.

Why should PA citizens be playing the lottery to help fund foreign teachers pensions when Corbett has such distain for teachers?

Reply

Mike Shortall

12:28 am on Monday, February 11, 2013

A couple of unemotional points to consider ...

1. Camelot is contractually guaranteeing to DOUBLE Pennsylvania profits by 2033. Raising $34 billion in the 20-year span of the proposed agreement. The State has raised only $22.6 billion in its entire 40 year existence.

2. Profit commitments will be backed by $200 million in cash collateral.

3. Since the lottery will remain active - even more so - as Camelot plans to grow the program, employment of Pennsylvanians would HAVE to continue. And obviously, Pennsylvanians, who do the REAL work behind the lottery program, would still be needed. Some redundant management positions would be lost initially. So all the accusations of lost jobs and disappearing pensions is a bit overdramatic.

4. Nobody ever holds a gun to anyone's head forcing them to play lottery games or to walk into a casino, be they rich, poor or somewhere in the middle. If this is how people want to spend their money, as they do on booze, why wouldn't you want that money to stay HERE rather go to some other State?

5. There is no plan that I have heard to reduce the support to PA seniors that the lottery currently provides. Has anyone else heard otherwise?

I'm no expert on the gaming industry, and only play maybe $40-50 a month on Powerball and MegaMillion dreams. But it sure would be difficult to turn down such a guaranteed revenue stream, don't you think?

Reply

Joe Joe JoeyJoe

5:55 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

Anyone who wants to support privitazation of the lottery is crazy. Outsourcing Pennsylvania jobs to a foreign company is un-American. Camelot will run away the second it's time to pay the fiddler.

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Ardmore-Merion-Wynnewood Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks